Enactivo knowledge or cognitive effective action.

The action is the result of learning a set of transactions that occur between the body and the environment. This action depends on the overall state of the system. Of the many stimuli in the environment, the body is coupled with structural strength to those who are more unbalanced. This is not the only environmental or external, depends on the internal state of the particular system. The same atmosphere (as niche) influence in different ways in the body present. Hunger, thirst, sex, among others, allow the emergence of the self and self-regulation in the body that carried the body to effectively a new state of equilibrium. The development activities will depend on the possibilities inherent to the species: if a paramecio, a gibbon or a human being. The actions are linked to cognitive actions and the actions perceptual motor perceptually guided. Taking the idea that knowledge builds on Francisco Varela enactivo, we'll see what he proposes as "embodied knowledge." (Francisco Varela, 1991:18)

1 - cognition depends on the type of experience that comes from having a body with multiple sensory-motor skills and
2 - sensory-motor skills these individuals are housed in turn in a larger cultural and biological

Francisco Varela in the book "This Body, (Gedisa, 1992:203) says" ... no enactivo The approach seeks to determine how it recovers a world independent of the recipient but to determine the common principles of legal linkage between the sensory and motor systems that explain how action can be perceptually guided in a world dependent on the beneficiary, "this sentence will be crucial for developing the theory of Quantum Resonance Theory of Cognitive we are developing. The approach enactivo reminds us of the beautiful Machado phrase "no walking paths, is the way to go." "The emergence of cognition is a world history through a viable structural coupling" (Varela, 1992:238) for each species: epigenesis. Later Varela says the condition of feasibility about the ontogeny and phylogeny. Francisco Varela's approach seems to be related body and knowledge of life and hence knowledge. It seems appropriate at this time to recover the contributions of Piaget (Piaget, 1979:91) to the problem we are proposing. The author argues that knowledge is directly related to the body and this in turn is consistent with the development of epigenetic system, ie the different cognitive levels of intracellular, intercellular, tissues, organs, as already ahead Juan Samaja above. . We must recognize that in this work Piaget produces a valuable contribution to recognize the existence of somatic levels of integration and communication between them. It also argues that the changes that produce the variations are the result of changes in the deepest levels. This creates the pattern of the standards of the most profound and communication systems with the other levels. The problem of the mind In the book of Dr. Martin Wainstein (Wainstein, 2006:94) Bateson produces quite a junction with the concepts previously worked in body hierarchical levels, subsystems, which tend to maintain a balance self. It is clear that the concept of mind Bateson looks like the concept of Umwelt von Uexküll. It is the embodied mind. Corporizada mind. Also the contribution of Kenneth J. Gergen (K. Gergen, 1994:212) says:

... .. The whole experience is a mental condition ... ... ..


"A complex system is a representation of a cut of that reality, conceptualized as an organized whole (hence the name system), in which the elements are not separable," and therefore can not be studied in isolation "


What is the appropriate methodology for the study of complex cognitive system?

Rolando Garcia argues (Garcia, 2000.40) "will use the term" complex cognitive "to refer to the whole set of all components of this highly heterogeneous. Garcia (Garcia, 2007.21) defines a complex system:
We began to see that the problem of knowledge is not possible to separate mind-body experience. This conclusion Garcia "and therefore can not be studied in isolation" We clarified that it is not possible to study the phenomenology of the body structure in isolation, nor those of the physical phenomena which links the structures extrinsic / intrinsic. We interpret our original thesis about the unity of complex minimum-energy-Communication Organization in cognitive systems, they constitute a complex system.

"A complex system is a representation of a cut of that reality, conceptualized as an organized whole (hence the name system), in which the elements are not separable," and therefore can not be studied in isolation "

Is there a relationship between self systems, and self-Systems?

Garcia Systems for Complex systems are self and self. From the perspective of the school in Brussels and the Organized Chaos Theory, we can recognize self systems in chemical systems and the sensitivity of such systems to initial conditions, developed on the laws of deterministic chaos, and valid for open systems away from the equilibrium conditions. Chaos Theory Generalized deepens its concepts leading to systems prebiotics-biotic and social. We can also observe certain forms of self-Euclidean not like the weather or catastrophic events. Here is an important contribution in developing the theory of catastrophes Rene Thom and mathematics of fractal morphic resonance Rupert Sheldrake. In this regard, the methodology of the Complex Systems acquires strategic importance in the study of complex cognitive from the perspective of self and self systems as open systems away from thermodynamic equilibrium. In this sense the removal of entropy (negentropia) means the contribution of order. The order could autogenerarse from certain properties of systems based on quantum resonances.

SEMIOTICA EVOLUTIONARY

Throughout the work we have built on the idea of evolutionary feature semiosis. But it has not yet been reflected what would be the model that should take the sign to reflect this situation. Since the various proposals only reveal the status of the sign at the time of stability. To do this, if we take the view Carlos Cossio. Or Saussure, Pierce, and so on. we will see in the list but only three elements to improve this assessment is necessary to the thought of John Samaja. But Juan Samaja produced a new model in the form of the sign reveals its evolutionary status. I think this deserves special attention because it puts us in front of a model that fits with what we have had previously. Ayudémonos with an image that takes into account some of the key levels of integration that we can imagine the reality as we present:

Civil Society

(effectiveness)
Society Policy (State)

(reflectión)

Cultural Community
(Traditión)

Biocomunidad
(mimesis)

Organismos
(tenacidad)

The diagram is trying to say that the higher levels (metaphorically speaking) are erected on the lower. At the same time, attempts to express the idea that the level never further depletes the bottom (of the floods there side). If the calls are lower levels earlier in time and are, somehow, the last of the above, reveals that two-way effect the past is still present: 1. because not all the lower level is captured and colonized by the superior and 2. because what is subsumed, it is not annihilated, as preserved and remains active within the level of integration that subsumes. We can say that the "debt to the past" is far from a "debt" with dead people. Returning for a few seconds to the issues that we try to talk about food. If protozoa are the subjects of previous levels of integration to metazoa, then, is still easy to recognize that protozoa in the world and who are our contemporaries. And to top it! It is also true that the mass of living protozoa is across the Earth, most important (quantitatively speaking) that the mass metazoa. Furthermore, our cells, which make up our tissues and organs that are removed are protozoa, preserved and passed on our body), which means that remain protozoa, but, as determined by its membership gives you a whole Now, its higher standard of existence. In a chart could look like this:

metazoari

ORGANISMS

protozoari BACTERIAS CÉLL
copresentes (Constituent)

Bacteria (protozarios) that are outside the rectangle of metazoa are, so to speak, in a relationship with the co-presence metazoa. But cells (also protozoa) that are within the rectangle, forming a constituent part of the metazoa: are "cells" and are subject certain regulated by their integration into all organismic. Well, just as there are living outside the unicellular organism (co) and cells that are part of it (constituents), there were insights of science and insights into science, there were traditions of science and traditions that are part it, there are metaphysical outside (and against) the science and metaphysics in science. This statement can be displayed in the diagram above as follows:

Sociedad Civil Investigación
(eficacia) científica

Filosofía
Sociedad Política (Estado) Científica
(reflexión/escritura)

Comunidad Cultural Tradiciones
(tradición oral) científicas


Bio-Comunidad imitaciones
(percepción/mímesis) científicas

Organismos intuiciones (percepción) científicas
(instintos)

This chart allows us to "see" the sign of which way is the product of evolution and this allows us to talk about as Semiotic evolutionary process. It is important to note that the process occurs Semiotic with the clear objective of conduct to guide the action from the body and located lived. Knowledge is "enactivo. However, I can take another contribution of Juan Samaja which immediately shows the process of semiotic.